Francesca Torri
Clinical variability and molecular complexity of FSHD: relevance of deep phenotyping and comprehensive genetics in characterizing atypical clinical cases
Autori
- FRANCESCA TORRI (DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF PISA, PISA, ITALY – NEUROLOGIA)
- CLAUDIA STRAFELLA (GENOMIC MEDICINE LABORATORY UILDM, IRCCS SANTA LUCIA FOUNDATION, ROME, ITALY – GENETICA MEDICA)
- LILIANA VERCELLI (NEUROMUSCULAR UNIT, DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSCIENCES; RITA LEVI MONTALCINI, UNIVERSITY OF TURIN, TURIN, ITALY – NEUROLOGIA)
- GIULIO GADALETA (NEUROMUSCULAR UNIT, DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSCIENCES; RITA LEVI MONTALCINI, UNIVERSITY OF TURIN, TURIN, ITALY – NEUROLOGIA)
- BARBARA RISI (NEUROMUSCULAR OMNICENTER, NEMO, FONDAZIONE SERENA ONLUS, MILAN, ITALY – NEUROLOGIA)
- LUCA COLANTONI (GENOMIC MEDICINE LABORATORY UILDM, IRCCS SANTA LUCIA FOUNDATION, ROME, ITALY – GENETICA MEDICA)
- ROSSELLA TUPLER (DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL, METABOLIC AND NEURAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA, MODENA, ITALY – GENETICA MEDICA)
- EMILIANO GIARDINA (GENOMIC MEDICINE LABORATORY UILDM, IRCCS SANTA LUCIA FOUNDATION, ROME, ITALY – GENETICA MEDICA)
- MASSIMILIANO FILOSTO (NEUROMUSCULAR OMNICENTER, NEMO, FONDAZIONE SERENA ONLUS, MILAN, ITALY – NEUROLOGIA)
- TIZIANA MONGINI (NEUROMUSCULAR UNIT, DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSCIENCES; RITA LEVI MONTALCINI, UNIVERSITY OF TURIN, TURIN, ITALY – NEUROLOGIA)
- GIULIA RICCI (DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF PISA, PISA, ITALY – NEUROLOGIA)
- GABRIELE SICILIANO (DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF PISA, PISA, ITALY – NEUROLOGIA)
Presentatore
FRANCESCA TORRI
Modalità
Oral Communication
Abstract
“Introduction: Facioscapolohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is the third most common dystrophy. A wide range of phenotypes are observed, that could show a different disease progression and/or imply distinct genetic mechanisms.
To date, the diagnostic criteria for FSHD are based on the detection of the genetic signature of the disease. However, the molecular diagnosis and the interpretation of the genetic test cannot ignore a careful correlation with the phenotype.
Methods: We present data of a cohort of 43 patients from 24 families selected by phenotypic features, characterized by incomplete penetrance/atypical phenotypes according to the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form (CCEF), in which a short D4Z4 allele segregated.
Assessment of 4q subtype, DNA methylation levels,WES and segregation analysis.
Results: Methylation levels displayed high variability in relation to the disease phenotype. In more than half of the atypical phenotypes, despite the detection of the FSHD genetic signature, WES analysis identified VUS or likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants in other genes associated with neuromuscular disorders, compatible with the observed phenotype, or known FSHD-modifying genes. A definitive alternative diagnosis was obtained in 5 families.
Conclusion: Our results further support the need to perform a detailed phenotypic characterization of patients with a suspect of FSHD, and, in cases of atypical phenotypes, to combine the D4Z4 sizing with other procedures such as WES. In this regard, methylation analysis represents a valuable tool to provide a preliminary evidence for FSHD to be confirmed by further testing.
Nevertheless, a correct diagnosis based on a comprehensive evaluation of patients is needed for familial counseling, prognosis, management and clinical trials readiness.”